SSSS 2014 Conference Notes, Omaha, NE – DrZhana

[email protected]

send me an email

SSSS 2014 Conference Notes, Omaha, NE

With my co-presenters, after our Consensual Nonnonogamy session

With my co-presenters, after our Consensual Nonnonogamy session

I just got back from the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Study of Sexuality, held this year in Omaha, Nebraska. I know, I know, not the first place that comes to mind when you think of a sex research conference, but it wasn’t that bad. We were staying downtown, and I was happy to see some development, pedestrians, and life – night time included – in this area, complete with a very cute Old Market area.

The conference was pretty great, as usual – I heard some really interesting talks, reconnected with old friends/colleagues and met new new ones, and gave three talks of my own. I was really happy to see lots of research and symposia on my favorite topics: casual sex & non-monogamy, and they seemed quite popular, with almost all those sessions with standing room only!

My favorite talk was probably Jim Pfaus’ plenary session on his fascinating behavioral and neuroscience research on the sexual behavior and arousal of rats – a typically promiscuous species which, given the right learning experiences, can be made monogamous (i.e., prefer a known partner over a novel one) and made to form very specific preferences for nonsexual cues (locations, scents, objects), eerily reminiscent of fetishes in humans. Check out Jim Pfaus‘ work at Concordia University in Montreal.

My own three talks were an interesting mix.

1. Promiscuous People Are More Victimized but Less Lonely presented a study (currently in press in Personal Relationships) which found that college students with more casual sex partners were the targets of more relational (i.e., indirect) aggression and sexuality-based prejudice, but they actually had more friends and felt less lonely, effects partially explained by their greater extraversion.

2. Who Wants an Open Relationship? discussed findings on how many Cornell students consider some form of consensual nonmonogamy to be their ideal relationship arrangement, and what demographic, personality, and sexuality characteristics distinguish these students from their more monogamously-interested peers.

3. Finally, Disseminating Sex Research to Broader Audiences was a joint symposium with three other scholars that I put together with the goal of sharing the importance of engaging with sex research more than just academics in our field. Our presentation covered four ways of disseminating sex research to broader audiences: running your own blog (Justin Lehmiller, PhD), writing/contributing to popular media outlets (Kristen Mark, PhD), conducting workshops with community members (Megan Maas, MA), and using Twitter (Zhana Vrangalova, PhD).

The slides from all three presentations are available for free download on @slideshare.

Giving three talks myself was highly gratifying, but also quite exhausting. It also prevents you from seeing other people’s talks. So I think I just made a decision to never present more than two talks again.

And that’s it folks for this conference update.

If you’d like to learn more about all the conference details (academic and nonacademic), there were a number of active live-tweeters, so just look up the #ssss2014 Twitter hashtag!

Related Posts

  • Upcoming Events Update!

    I’ve got a couple of exciting live events happening in the next few weeks! Check out all the info below: ​​​​​​​​​​​​ THURSDAY, 12/6, 7PM: Doctor’s Orders: Real Doctors Debate Your Toughest Questions What happens when a biologist, physician, neuroscientist and sex researcher join together to answer questions you may have never felt comfortable asking your own doctor? Join us at The Assemblage (in NoMad) to find out in the new game-show like panel as we incite audience participation, ask hard, silly or downright strange questions and hear top experts in their respective fields discuss topics that feel taboo even in the privacy

  • A New Study Explains Why Many Lesbians Are Biased Against Bisexual Women

    Bisexual folks commonly fall victim to the “double stigma” surrounding their sexual orientation. Compared to heterosexuals, lesbian and gay folks still have more positive attitudes towards bisexual people, but compared to other gay, lesbian, queer, bisexual, asexual and pansexual people, lesbians and gay men harbor the most bi-negativity. “So, why are many lesbians so anti-bi? A new study recently published in the journal Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity suggests that this might be due to what the researchers call the androcentric desire hypothesis: The fact that people (gay men and lesbians alike) perceive bisexuals as being more sexually attracted to men

  • Study Finds Queer Folks Are 20 Times More Likely to Be Activists Than Cishets

    Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people are more likely to be activists in more than just the LGBT movement, according to recent research. It wouldn’t come as a surprise that people are most likely to engage in activism for their own group: There are far fewer men than women at feminist rallies, for example, and far fewer heterosexuals than queer folks at pride marches. But is there some crossover between social movements? In other words, are people who belong to one stigmatized group more likely to be also active in social movements that primarily affect other stigmatized groups? A new study using a

The Science of Sex Podcast

The Science of Sex Podcast

Listen to comedian, Joe Pardavila, and I sit down each week with a new sex researcher to talk about the latest information on anything and everything to do with sex.