Study Finds Disturbing Conclusion About ‘Revenge Porn’ But Experts Are Dubious – DrZhana

Zhana@DrZhana.com

send me an email

Study Finds Disturbing Conclusion About ‘Revenge Porn’ But Experts Are Dubious

Gizmodo recently reached out to me to comment on a new study that claims that 99% of people approve of revenge porn.

For anyone who doesn’t know, revenge porn is posting intimate photos of other people online without their consent, as retaliation against them for hurting you. This can obviously be very damaging for many people; the publishing of sexy or nude pictures has ruined many people’s careers. Yet, according to this study, virtually all of its 100 respondents (most of whom women), “expressed at least some approval (e.g. did not feel remorse) of revenge porn”. 

As you can read in the Gizmodo article, several scholars, myself included had serious methodological issues with this study and their conclusion. Here, I dig deeper into the science behind this study to figure out what exactly is going on here.

Fortunately for humanity (and unfortunately for the revenge porn posters), this claim is highly misleading of what the study actually found.

First, the authors didn’t actually measure “approval” of revenge porn; approval is about attitudes, something you’d measure by asking people about whether they found revenge porn morally acceptable or something like that. Instead, the authors measured people’s anticipated negative emotional reactions to revenge porn, specifically asked them how much blame, anger, and regret they would feel in response to imaginary revenge porn scenarios. Then they reverse scored people’s ratings and called it approval. Not good.

But this is where it gets really bad. (I apologize for the statistics-heavy paragraph, but understanding how the “approval” scale was constructed is key to understanding what’s so misleading about this). Each of the three emotional reactions to 5 separate imaginary scenarios of revenge porn was measured on a 5-point scale of 1-Not at all to 5-Very much. These were then summed together in a scale ranging from 15 to 75, with 75 meaning the person said they would feel “very regretful”, AND “very guilty”, AND “very angry” in all 5 scenarios, and 15 meaning they wouldn’t feel any of these emotions “at all” in all 5 scenarios. So, the authors claim that “99% of participants expressed at least some approval of the revenge porn being committed in the scenarios” was based on the number of participants who scored something lower than 75 on this scale. But that’s just not true! What is true is that 99% of participants felt something other than extreme anger AND blame AND regret to ALL 5 imaginary revenge porn scenarios.

And this actually tells us VERY LITTLE about how the sample as a whole felt about this issue. Because while yes, only 1 person may have felt the extreme level of all three negative emotions in all five scenarios, it’s highly possible (and I’d venture to guess, highly probable) that most people’s overall reactions were still pretty negative, like a 4 or a 5 on the three emotions across the 5 scenarios. In other words, the average level of distress may still have been pretty high, like a 4.5 on that 5-point scale, but you’d never know that from the way the data were presented by the participants. And the kind of information that we’d need to make any real sense of where the sample lies on this scale — the means and the standard deviations for this scale — are notably absent from the paper.

Revenge porn is a fascinating topic with very little research in terms of motivations, outcomes, and people’s perceptions of it. I really hope that we’ll see more studies of this topic (and many others!) with better methods in the future.

Comments

comments

Related Posts

  • Once a Cheater, Always a Cheater?: TSOS Podcast Ep. 15

    Once a cheater, always a cheater…right? Goes Deeper In our 15th episode of The Science of Sex, Joe and I spoke with Kayla Knopp, the lead author on a study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior that focuses on the likelihood of “serial cheating” in individuals. Knopp is currently a PhD candidate in Clinical Psychology at the University of Denver, working under Dr. Galena Rhoades, Dr. Howard Markman, and Dr. Scott Stanley in the Center for Marital and Family Studies in the Department of Psychology at DU. Her research focuses on couples and romantic relationships, with particular focus on commitment processes, diversity, and

  • Let’s Talk About Sexts – TSOS Podcast, Ep. 14!

    What do the sexting habits of adults 21 and over look like? Goes Deeper In a recent paper published in the Journal Sexual Health, researchers from Indiana University surveyed a nationally representative sample of almost 6,000 single US adults ages 21+ about their sexting experiences, sending and receiving sexually explicit text messages or photos. Dr. Justin Garcia, from the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University joined us to talk about the study. Dr. Justin Garcia is Ruth Halls Associate Professor of Gender Studies and Associate Director for Research and Education at The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington. His research interests focus on the

  • Is Love at First Sight Real? – #SexyInsightswithDrZ

    Turns out that what people commonly refer to as “love at first sight” is really just infatuation at first sight. If you liked my Forbes article on this topic check out the latest #SexyInsightswithDrZ video that I made where I go further into this #legitsexscience! If you would like to support my work, please consider becoming a Patreon support at Patreon.com/DrZhana for as little as $2 a month! Comments comments

Get on my list and get free, instant access to three key questions you should ask yourself before trying out an open relationship!

Free Access

FACEBOOK

In a new #fMRI study, researchers investigated neural correlates of responses to erotic stimuli in 26 heterosexual, 26 #bisexual, and 24 #homosexual women, ages 25–50. Results confirm other research on #sexualorientation: #lesbians (like #gay and straight men) show greater brain activation to images of women (vs. men), but hetero women’s brains are like those of #bisexuals, responding equally to male and female stimuli. The takeaway? Homosexual women have greater #gender bias in their responses to male and female erotic stimuli. Interestingly, this study is also the first of its kind to include bisexual women!
#legitsexscience #sexscience #sexresearch #sexsciencenews
link to study: ow.ly/QulC30hLCTL
... See MoreSee Less

View on Facebook